Legal Opinion
Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLP
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 14, 2011No. 5:08-cv-00119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Accenture’s Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. No. 311) and Accenture’s Motion for New Trial or Remittitur (Doc. No. 312). Upon considering the motions, all responses thereto, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law must be denied, and the Motion for New Trial or Remittitur must be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Wellogix, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Wellogix”) filed suit against Defendant…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Broker Genius, Inc. v. ZaltaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ultraflo Corp. v. Pelican Tank Parts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. v. MataDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
- Pengu Swim School, LLC v. Blue Legend, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.