Bell v. Tri-City Hospital District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs William Donald Bell and Lillian Bell appeal from the judgment of dismissal entered after the demurrer of defendant Tri-City Hospital District (Tri-City) was sustained without leave to amend. The court’s ruling was based on the Bells’ failure to file an action against Tri-City within the 30-day period provided by Government Code section 946.6, subdivision (f) 1 after the Bells obtained relief from the claim presentation requirement of section 94S.4. 2 We conclude, however, that the Bells’ first amended complaint which was on file at the time the court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ard v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Tun v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Orr v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.