State v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
As part of the California Tort Claims Act, Government Code section 900 et seq. 1 establishes certain conditions precedent to the filing of a lawsuit against a public entity. As relevant here, a plaintiff must timely file a claim for money or damages with the public entity. (§ 911.2.) The failure to do so bars the plaintiff from bringing suit against that entity. (§ 945.4.) In this case, we consider whether failure to allege facts demonstrating or excusing compliance with this claim presentation requirement subjects a complaint to a general demurrer. We conclude it does.
I
Plainti…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Willy H. Willis v. Thomas B. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Phillips v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by308 opinions
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Young v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Butler v. Los Angeles CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
303 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.