Legal Opinion

Ard v. County of Contra Costa

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2001No. A092381PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint against the County of Contra Costa (the County) on the ground that the action was time-barred by Government Code section 946.6.1 In opposition to the demurrer, plaintiff claimed he substantially complied with section 946.6 and argued that the County was estopped from disputing timeliness of the action. Although the complaint was filed beyond the time limit of section 946.6, plaintiffs estoppel argument raised a factual issue inappropriate for *342determination on demurrer. We conclude the plaintiff should have had an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Creighton v. City of LivingstonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Williams v. Housing Authority of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. May v. City of MilpitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API