Legal Opinion
Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney Hansen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1959No. 15782PublishedCited by 348 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This appeal, in an action for violation of civil rights, presents three major questions:(1) The sufficiency of the second amended complaint to state a cause of action;(2) The right to immunity, if any, possessed by state executive officers, and(3) The impact of the statute of limitations upon the alleged cause.
The defendants below, here appellees, moved to dismiss the second amended complaint of Hoffman on the grounds of, (1) failure to state a claim for relief, and (2) that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations of Oregon. 1
The trial court entered…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by348 opinions
- Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bogart v. PeopleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.