Wallingford v. Alcorn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles. Judge. Action on note by S. T. Alcorn against C. W. Wallingford and another. From judgment for plaintiff, ,the defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainst, J.
This is an action on a promissory note instituted by S. T. Alcom, as plaintiff, against C. W. Wallingford and William D. Upson, as defendants. Trial was had to a jury resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the principal of the note in the sum of $333.35. Following the amount awarded the verdict contained this language: “Without interest, and costs equally divided between plaintiff and defendants.” From the judgment rendered pursuant to the verdict the defendants have appealed to this court, assigning several alleged errors, which will be hereinafter considered. The plaintiff has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Griffith v. CreightonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Morrill v. BaggottIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Bradley & Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Smith v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Whale v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Getman v. HayhowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.