First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. Latham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Errer from Johnston .County Court; Nick Wolfe, Judge. Action by C. D. Latham against the First National Bank of Tishomingo. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHABP, C.
It is first urged that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to quash the return of service of summons. The petition was filed January 18, 1909, and on the same day the court issued a summons in the regular form, directed to the sheriff of Johnston county, commanding him to notify the First National Bank of Tishomingo that it had been sued by C. D. Latham in the county court of Johnston county, Oída. The return and answer days were named in the body of the summons. Summons was issued under the seal of the court and signed by the judge thereof. There was indorsed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaughtrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Grinnell v. SpinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Wallingford v. AlcornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.