Legal Opinion

Getman v. Hayhow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 14063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, appeals from an order of the trial court overruling a motion of plaintiff in error‘to modify the journal entry of judgment.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for the sum of $850 balance due on a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, together with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from January 12, 1920, and interest on $900 at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from November 11, 1919, to January 12, 1920, and for $100…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Wallingford v. AlcornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Holmes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Beindorf v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. L. S. Cogswell Lbr. Co. v. FoltzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Fletcher v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API