Legal Opinion

Continental Gin Co. v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1915No. 5142PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; s S¡ H. Russell, Judge. Action by the Continental Gin Company, a corporation, and R. M: Collett, trustee in deed of trust, against Ira L. Arnold and wife. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

The parties will be designated here as in the trial court. This action was instituted for the recovery of an alleged balance due upon notes. It appears that on July 25, 1905, defendant Ira L. Arnold signed six notes in the sum of $400 each, made payable to plaintiff Continental Gin Company for purchase of cotton gin machinery, and to secure the payment of the same he mortgaged to plaintiff certain real property upon which the said cotton gin containing said machinery was located, and certain other real property was mortgaged for the same purpose; said last-named mortgage…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Berdell v. BissellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. Perin v. CathcartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Eastern Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Wallingford v. AlcornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Gunn v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API