Legal Opinion

Bradley & Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1922No. 10745PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Mayes county; Hon. E. B. Arnold, Judge.

The defendants were indebted to plaintiff on a promissory note in the sum of $1,495.25. plus interest and attorney’s fee, said note bearing date, August It, 1914, and maturing October 1st. and on which note suit was filed in the district court of Mayes county. Okla., November 5. 1914. The defendant A. T. McLaughlin was engaged in the mercantile business at Salina, Okla. McLaughlin sold his mercantile business to one E. J. Bigham. and in compliance with the Bulk Sales Law. Bigham, on November 19, 1914, notified…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Lord v. . AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hatchett v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Jones v. WettlinWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McGlynn v. GranstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Bounds v. GoochSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Wilkins v. SkoglundNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API