Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Metal Goods Manufacturing Co. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 29, 1984No. (2090)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

This is an appeal 1 by the named defendant, the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act; General Statutes §§ 31-222 through 31-274h; from the judgment of the trial court denying benefits to the claimant. The administrator awarded benefits. General Statutes § 31-241. The plaintiff, who is the employer, appealed to an appeals referee; General Statutes § 31-242; who affirmed the award. The plaintiff appealed to the employment security board of review; General Statutes § 31-249; which also affirmed the award. The trial court sustained the plaintiff’s subsequent appeal; General Statutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Roy v. Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. HolmesOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Buscher v. Admin. Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv-97-0571229 (Jan. 8, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  3. Latina v. Administrator, Unemployment Comp. Act, No. 564559 (Jan. 26, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  4. Queen Anne Ent. v. Admin. Unemp. Comp. Act, No. 95-010962s (Jun. 5, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Walsh v. Ct Unemployment Comp., No. Cv 99 0586121s (Feb. 26, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API