Legal Opinion
Roy v. Centennial Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 24, 1976PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, J.
Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 908 of the General Statutes (§§ 52-406, 52-407), the parties submitted an agreed case to the Superior Court to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover under the “uninsured motorist” provisions of an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant. The court determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and she has appealed to this court.
The agreed-npon facts may he briefly summarized as follows: On February 6,1971, Tina Roy, a minor, was injured as a result of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by Anthony…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Pecker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Berlinski v. OvelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.