Legal Opinion
Buscher v. Admin. Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv-97-0571229 (Jan. 8, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 8, 1998No. CV-97-0571229Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT In this statutory appeal concerning unemployment compensation, the pro se plaintiff Sarah E. Buscher (hereinafter "Buscher") appeals the decision of the board of review that affirmed the referee's decision denying her benefits. The Administrator has moved for judgment dismissing Buscher's appeal. Buscher has also moved for judgment claiming that the cigarette smoke at her job caused her severe medical problems and was the reason that she quit. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Acro Technology, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Berger v. TonkenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bridgeport Metal Goods Manufacturing Co. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984