Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Holmes
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The question here presented is whether an employee may voluntarily quit work continuously available to him by his employer in Ohio, move to a distant state where he accepts employment and iater becomes unemployed, refuse work for which he is reasonably fitted and offered him in good faith by his former Ohio employer, on the ground that the offer of such employment is an offer of new work not suitable because of its distance from employee’s present residence, and at the same time qualify himself to collect unemployment benefits as to such former Ohio employer.
The answer to this problem…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Hunter v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Kut v. Albers Super Markets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Western Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Bridgeport Metal Goods Manufacturing Co. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- A.P. Parts Co. v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988