Legal Opinion

Queen Anne Ent. v. Admin. Unemp. Comp. Act, No. 95-010962s (Jun. 5, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 5, 1997No. 95-0109162SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This is an appeal brought by the employer, Queen Anne Enterprises, Ltd., from a granting of unemployment compensation benefits to Sandra Clark. The Administrator determined that Sandra Clark was ineligible for benefits after a hearing and decision issued pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 31-241. Upon appeal by the claimant, Sandra Clark, the Referee conducted a de novo hearing, made findings of fact, and reversed the Administrator's decision holding that she was entitled to benefits.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API