Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Veneman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 16, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-1423(PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs “Notice of Counsel’s Travel to Washington D.C. on Matter Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.” Plaintiffs counsel James W. Myart, Jr. filed this notice on November 8, 2005 to inform the Court that he would be traveling to Washington, D.C. (plaintiffs counsel practices from an office in San Antonio, Texas) for a hearing before another judge of this Court in a different ease from the above-captioned one. The last sentence of the notice states that “... he [plaintiffs’ counsel] does not want…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pigford v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Cobell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hildebrandt v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Hildebrandt v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Williams v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API