Legal Opinion

Pigford v. Veneman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 3, 2005No. Nos. CIV.A. 97-1978(PLF); CIV.A. 98-1693(PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*55 OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

On December 22, 2004, Mr. James Myart, Esq. filed, on behalf of his client, Mr. Thomas Burrell, a “Notice of Unprofessional Conduct by Michael Sitcov in Connection with Allegations of Department of Justice/Attorney Misconduct in Direct Relation to Class Members Cases and Defendant’s Appeals of Arbitrator Awards.” This is not the first document captioned “Notice” that Mr. Myart has filed in this case, and the Court is less than pleased at counsel’s repeated use of the Court’s docket as a forum for what are, in essence, press releases. This most recent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. Lorenzo W. Coats v. Percy PierreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sitcov v. District of Columbia BarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Hildebrandt v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Holloman v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  4. Hunt v. Steffensen (In re Steffensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2014
  5. Hildebrandt v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API