Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 2003No. CIV.A. 96-1285 (RCL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 23, 2002 order prohibiting communications with class members pursuant to Rule 23(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [1715-1], which was filed on January 8, 2003. Upon consideration of defendants’ motion, defendants’ reply brief,1 *34and the applicable law in this case, the Court finds that defendants’ motion should be denied.
Defendants have brought this motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that “[a]ny…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Winston Massiah, Mitchell Anfield, Leonard Royal Aiken and Icky ThornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pigford v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Hildebrandt v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005