Legal Opinion
Hildebrandt v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2004-1423PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND OipER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge :
Plaintiffs in this action, George and Patricia Hildebrandt,. claim that the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) refused to provide them with applications for farm loans and/or for loan servicing, and that these refusals were made on the basis of'the Hildebrandts’ face, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et séq.. The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) has filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the Hildebrandts have suffered no injury and therefore lack standing, and that they-have…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Presidential Bank, Fsb v. 1733 27th Street Se LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bean v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Dennard v. RollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Peter B. v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.