Legal Opinion

Williams v. Johanns

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 26, 2007No. Civil Action 03-2245 (CKK/JMF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case was referred to me for all discovery disputes. Plaintiffs have recently filed several motions for consideration, including (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of Imposition of Sanctions Against Plaintiffs and Counsel for Failure to Respond to Discovery; (2) Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Reconsideration of Imposition of Sanctions Against Plaintiffs and Counsel for Failure to Respond to Discovery (“Pls.Amend.Recon.”); (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Witness List and Respectful Request for Expedited Ruling…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pigford v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Williams v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Hildebrandt v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Williams v. JohannsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Williams v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Williams v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API