Legal Opinion
Hildebrandt v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2004-1423PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs, along with the defendants’ motion to strike a “notice of filing” submitted by the plaintiffs shortly after the filing of their memorandum opposing the motion for sanctions. The defendants seek dismissal of this case (or, in the alternative, other severe sanctions) due to the plaintiffs’ failure to obey a discovery order, along with other conduct by the plaintiffs that the defendants contend has protracted this action and forced them to expend time and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Dubicz v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Feld v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- 3e Mobile, LLC v. Global Cellular, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Breen v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hildebrandt v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.