Legal Opinion

Miller v. Norris Creameries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1976No. 46534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

2Per curiam

The employer and insurer seek review by writ of certiorari of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding them reimbursement from the special compensation fund for only those amounts of compensation and medical benefits paid to the employee in excess of 52 weeks of disability and $2,000 medical expenses. The issue on appeal is what is the controlling event which determines the amount of reimbursement to which an employer and insurer are entitled under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The employee’s back disability was registered…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Miller v. Norris CreameriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Stangel v. LAKEHEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Lutz v. Spencer Packing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nieves v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Manikowske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Prevost v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API