Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Magnus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1989No. C3-89-117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

The personal representative for the estate of Dorothy Magnus petitioned the trial court for an order determining whether a bequest had been adeemed. The motion was set for hearing and notice was duly given. Appellants Donald and Gerald Sweeney failed to appear at the hearing. By order on December 21, 1988, the trial judge ruled the bequest was fully adeemed and failed in its entirety because the decedent had no ownership interest in the bequeathed property at the time of her death.

Donald and Gerald Sweeney, the intended beneficiaries under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. James v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Matter of Estate of TrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Michaels v. First USA Title, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In Re Estate of MagnusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. In Re the Estate of McCueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API