Legal Opinion

Ruether v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1990No. C1-89-1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

We review by certiorari a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing the compensation judge’s denial of benefits. The WCCA affirmed the compensation judge’s determination that the employee had not sustained a compensable occupational disease, but it found that the employee had sustained a compensable brain injury as a result of contact with toxic chemicals at work and awarded wage loss benefits. We reverse.

After working as a medical technician in the Mankato State University Student Health Service for about eight years, the employee took a leave of absence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Golob v. Buckingham HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Hagen v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health Systems, Injured Workers Pharmacy, and Onword Therapy, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Krotzer v. Browning-Ferris/Woodlake Sanitation ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API