Legal Opinion

Worden v. County of Houston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1984No. C0-83-1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals which, with two judges dissenting, applied the presumption set forth in Minn.Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15 (1982), to find that the coronary arteriosclerosis which caused employee’s myocardial infarction was an occupational disease. We are satisfied that the statutory presumption was applicable in this case, but we reverse the award of benefits because we find that the employer overcame the presumption with uncontra-dicted medical evidence that the disease and disability were the result of recognized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Golob v. Buckingham HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Linnell v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cunningham v. City of Manchester Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Medlin v. County of Henrico PoliceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Courtney Ex Rel. Higdem v. City of OronoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API