Legal Opinion

Carter v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1961No. Docket 38, Calendar 48,892PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This is an appeal from the Wayne' circuit court in which appellant Michigan employment security commission contends that an employee discharged by a corporation should be disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits because of misconduct. The facts as found by the referee and appeal board of the Michigan employment security commission indicated that the discharge was based on the employee’s refusal to carry out a foreman’s order, and his subsequent threat to punch the foreman in the nose. The circuit judge held that this was not misconduct within the meaning of the statute. We reverse.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Linski v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Cassar v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Metzger Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sonsearaharay POLK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., an Indiana Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Mino v. Clio School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Kirk v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dailey v. Board of Review, West Virginia Bureau of Employment ProgramsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API