Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cassar v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1955No. Docket 6-13, Calendar 46,395-46,402PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1DissentSmith, J.

On the morning of October 24, 1952, Floyd Buckingham, president of Local 56 of the UAW-CIO (hereafter termed the union), was discharged by his employer, defendant and appellee Precision Manufacturing Company (hereafter termed the company). This action on the part of the company brought in its wake the various incidents which have culminated in the appeal.

It is stipulated that the reason given by the company for the discharge was Buckingham’s misconduct connected with the work. The company’s letter to the union stated that he had “wilfully misused the property of the company, so as to endanger…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Carter v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Linski v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wickey v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API