Legal Opinion

Levy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1903No. S.F. No. 3132PublishedCited by 10 opinions

CERTIORARI to review an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco- vacating an order setting apart a homestead. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

On December 30, 1901, the superior court, respondent herein, made and entered an order in the matter of the estate of Henry Levy, deceased, setting apart as a homestead to the petitioner'herein, Pauline Levy, widow of the deceased, certain described premises for the period of her widowhood. "Within seventeen days thereafter the executors of the will of decedent, and also Hattie Rosenblum, an heir of decedent, filed and served notices of motions to set aside said homestead order. Said motions were made on the grounds, among others, that the order was obtained through the “inadvertence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. De Pedrorena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Estate of HickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Estate of LaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Estate of MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Seaman v. Bank of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API