Legal Opinion

Estate of Hickey

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900No. S.F. No. 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

•APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the final account of an administrator and decreeing distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coifey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The transcript shows two appeals by A. C. Freese, administrator of the above estate—one from an order of the court made September 26, 1898, and filed on the 30th of said month, settling the final account of the administrator; and the other, made and filed at the same time, setting apart the residue of the estate to the minor heirs, William E. Hickey and Francis T. Hickey. No objection is made to the correctness of these orders, provided the court had jurisdiction to make them; but the contention of appellant is that the court had theretofore, on December 21, 1896, made its order and decree…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Estate of MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Estate of McCraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API