Legal Opinion

De Pedrorena v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1889No. 13181PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application for a writ of review to the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the. opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

On the twenty-third day of June, 1888, after due proceedings had, a decree of distribution was ■made and entered in the superior court of San Diego County in the matter of the estate of Maria' A. E. de Pedrorena, deceased. Within six months thereafter, to wit, on.December :20, 1888, the court, on motion of certain -interested parties, vacated and set aside said decree of distribution.

The petitioner herein now asks for a writ of review, claiming that the court exceeded its jurisdiction in making the order'vacating the decree of distribution.

We think that the court had the power at any time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re Grove StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. In re the Estate of HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. In Re Estate of LaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Borchard v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API