Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Layton

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12754PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

After further consideration of this cause, we find ourselves in agreement with the opinion rendered by the District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, when this appeal was before that court. We, therefore, adopt said opinion as the opinion of this court. Said opinion as written by Fricke, Justice pro tern., is as follows:

“Edwin C. Layton died in Los Angeles, leaving him surviving his wife, Alice B. Layton, a daughter, Marguerite Layton (also known as Marguerite Nolan), and a brother and two sisters, Ernest H. Layton, Grace Layton Laughlin and Maude Layton Clendenin,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of KurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In Re Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. Estate of GlassfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API