Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hudson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1883PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco sustaining the demurrer to and dismissing the petition to set aside the decree of distribution. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

Henry C. Hudson, a resident of Hew Jersey, died in that State December 6, 1871; his will was admitted to probate, in that State, December 28, 1871, and on the 28th of April, 1872, an exemplified copy was admitted to probate in this State. William H. Brokaw received letters testamentary in Hew Jersey, and C. C. Burr in this State. The will bequeathed to the present petitioners, residing in Hew Jersey, §4,700, to persons residing in San Francisco, §4,100, and to other persons, §5,300. The remainder, if any, after the payment of debts and legacies, was to go to the widow of deceased. In January,…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API