Legal Opinion

Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Ross

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1964No. S. F. 21571PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate in a proceeding to compel various officers of the City and County of San Francisco (hereinafter called “the city”) to take the steps set forth in the city charter to certify the availability of funds for payment under a contract for the performance of public improvements.

The dispositive issue is whether at the time mandate was sought the defendant city controller was under a clear ministerial duty to make such certification. For the reasons hereinafter delineated we have concluded that the controller was under such a duty;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. MulqueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API