Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Spery

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 6, 2002No. Misc. AG No. 8, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against Robert M. Spery, respondent, alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter “MRPC”). The Commission charged respondent with violating MRPC 8.4(c) (Misconduct). We referred the matter to Judge Donald F. Johnson of the Circuit Court for Dorchester County to make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing, Judge Johnson concluded that respondent violated Rule 8.4(c).

I

Judge Johnson made…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API