Legal Opinion
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 2010No. B223184PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
In the underlying action, real parties in interest sought to recover civil penalties from petitioner Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot), under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.).1 The trial court overruled Home Depot’s demurrer to the first amended complaint, which contains a claim under PAGA based on Home Depot’s alleged failure to provide seating to its employees pursuant to section 1198 and Industrial Welfare Commission wage order No. 7-2001 *215(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11070). Home Depot challenges this ruling by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ZB, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- McKenzie v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Raines v. Coastal Pac. Food Distribs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Carrington v. Starbucks Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.