Legal Opinion

People v. Daniels

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1969No. Crim. 10999PublishedCited by 461 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

By amended indictment defendant Simmons was charged in count I with raping Miss M. by means of force and threat (Pen. Code, §261, subds. 3 and 4); in count II defendants Daniels and Simmons were charged with kidnaping Mrs. R. for the purpose of robbery, the victim suffering bodily harm (Pen. Code, § 209); in count III Simmons was charged with kidnaping Miss S. for the purpose of robbery, the victim suffering bodily harm (Pen. Code, § 209); and in count IV Daniels…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by461 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

456 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API