Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 14, 2011No. Case CV 10-02420 GAF (PLAx)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff LaMecia McKenzie (“McKenzie”) worked as a Federal Express Corpo ration (“FedEx”) truck driver from April 2003 to July of 2009. She was classified as an hourly employee and received periodic paychecks accompanied by wage statements that purportedly explained how the amount of her pay was derived. In this lawsuit, McKenzie claims that FedEx’s wage statements were, at best, ambiguous as to the hours worked and rates of pay, and that they were entirely deficient in their failure to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Liliana Canela v. CostcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Joseph Baumann v. Chase Investment Services CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Willner v. Manpower Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.