State v. Montgomery
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. At sentencing, the trial court ordered him to pay costs, attorney fees and restitution and to sell his car to satisfy those obligations. He did not object to the court’s order. We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.
Defendant argues that there is no statutory authority for the trial court to require him to sell assets to meet the financial obligations imposed by the judgment. The state concedes that the trial court erred in ordering defendant to sell his car, because the car had not been used in any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. GammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. Orsi/GauthierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Cheryl Wilcox Property Management v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Cheryl Wilcox Property Management v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.