State v. Carpenter
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the first degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. ORS 163.185; ORS 164.135. He assigns error to the court’s imposition of restitution as part of his sentence. ORS 161.675(1). 1 We affirm.
The sentence requires that defendant pay restitution “in an amount not to exceed $40,000, said restitution to be paid * * * at a payment rate and schedule to be determined by his parole officer * * Defendant argues that the trial court lacked authority to delegate the setting of a specific restitution payment schedule to the Board of Parole. See State…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. KizerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GruverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. LunskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.