Cheryl Wilcox Property Management v. Appel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*92RIGGS, J.
In this forcible entry and detainer action, defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff. They assign error to the trial court’s award of damages under ORS 90.900(3).1 We vacate the award.
Defendants rented property from plaintiff for $500 per month under a month-to-month agreement. On July 5, 1990, plaintiff mailed defendants a 30-day notice to terminate the tenancy on August 8,1990. Defendants did not move out. On August 9, plaintiff filed this action. The complaint alleged that “plaintiff is entitled to possession of the premises because: 30-day notice (month-to-month tenancy)”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Cole v. FOGELOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Heintz v. SINNER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Navas v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Northwest Marketing Corp. v. Fore-Ward Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.