State v. Wills
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of rape I, sodomy I and sexual abuse I. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.405; ORS 163.425. We affirm the convictions but remand with instructions to vacate the portion of the judgment purporting to impose a forfeiture of his assets.
In addition to imposing a compensatory fine, see ORS 137.101, the court ordered that defendant forfeit “any assets” to pay it. Defendant did not object to either the fine or the forfeiture. The statute authorizes a compensatory fine. Without an objection having been made to the fine, there is nothing to review. However, an objection is not required in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. GammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.