Legal Opinion

State v. Wills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1988No. 85-03-31133; CA A43558PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of rape I, sodomy I and sexual abuse I. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.405; ORS 163.425. We affirm the convictions but remand with instructions to vacate the portion of the judgment purporting to impose a forfeiture of his assets.

In addition to imposing a compensatory fine, see ORS 137.101, the court ordered that defendant forfeit “any assets” to pay it. Defendant did not object to either the fine or the forfeiture. The statute authorizes a compensatory fine. Without an objection having been made to the fine, there is nothing to review. However, an objection is not required in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. GammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API