State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, appellant argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by ordering appellant to pay restitution; (2) erred by ordering appellant to reimburse the public defender’s office without a hearing; and (3) erred by ordering appellant to sell his car to satisfy his restitution obligations. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS, On March 4, 2013, a police officer on patrol in St. Paul observed a BMW fail to stop for pedestrians in a marked pedestrian crosswalk. The officer activated his emergency lights and siren, but the BMW…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Welfare of I.N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Emile ReyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017