Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 2014No. A14-409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

In this sentencing appeal, appellant argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by ordering appellant to pay restitution; (2) erred by ordering appellant to reimburse the public defender’s office without a hearing; and (3) erred by ordering appellant to sell his car to satisfy his restitution obligations. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS, On March 4, 2013, a police officer on patrol in St. Paul observed a BMW fail to stop for pedestrians in a marked pedestrian crosswalk. The officer activated his emergency lights and siren, but the BMW…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of I.N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State of Minnesota v. Emile ReyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API