Legal Opinion

Marriage of Huntsman v. Huntsman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 2001No. C1-00-1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This appeal arises from the marital dissolution of appellant James Richard Huntsman and respondent Zenith Annette Huntsman. Review of the underlying claims is not before this court. We granted review to decide the narrow question of whether the provision in Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 104.01, subd. 2, for the commencement of the appeal period applies where judgment has been entered on the order disposing of a proper and timely post-decision motion. The court of appeals held that it does not and dismissed the appeal as untimely. We reverse.

On April 23, 1998, appellant served…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Marriage of Kornberg v. KornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Madson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. In Re the Welfare of S.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Marriage of Mingen v. MingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API