Legal Opinion
Marriage of Rubey v. Vannett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 4, 2006No. A05-310PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case arises from the dissolution of appellant Thomas Rubey and respondent Valerie Vannett’s marriage. Although they settled some issues, Rubey and Van-nett went to trial to determine who would be awarded physical custody of their child. After the trial, the district court issued an order granting sole physical and legal custody to Vannett. Rubey filed a motion for a new trial or amended findings (new trial/amended findings motion). Because the hearing on the motion occurred outside of the 60-day time frame required by Minn. R. Civ. P 59.03, the district court found…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. LeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.