Legal Opinion
Schiltz v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 1990No. C3-89-53PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
The City of Duluth obtained further review of a decision of the court of appeals, 435 N.W.2d 625, dismissing its appeal from an order of the district court denying its motion for a new trial in a mandamus action. We reverse and remand to court of appeals for further proceedings.
Earl W. Schiltz, a veteran, was employed by the city as a manager of employee relations until his layoff in April 1981. He commenced this mandamus action after he unsuccessfully sought relief through the civil service system and after his request for a hearing under the Veterans Preference Act,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State ex rel. Matthews v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. McKellarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Madson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Kaibel v. Municipal Building CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Matter of GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.