Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Powell v. United States

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 4, 1993No. Action No. 2:92CV1244PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

The United States filed a Motion for Physical Examination of the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff objected to Dr. Colin W. Hamilton conducting the medical examination and stated that he would submit to a physical examination by any other ortho-paedic surgeon in the region. The plaintiff contends that Dr. Hamilton is biased against plaintiffs in law suits.

This motion is the latest in a series of motions filed by various plaintiffs’ counsel seeking to prevent Dr. Cohn W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stinchcomb v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  3. Liechty v. Terrill Trucking Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971
  4. Main v. Tony L. Sheston-Luxor Cab CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Adkins v. EitelOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  2. Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  3. Greenhorn v. Marriott Intern., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Holland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  5. Sexton v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API