Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Eitel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1965No. 384PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we have a bill of exceptions which has been certified as being a true and complete transcription of the testimony and proceedings held on a hearing of the following motion of the defendants:

“Now come the defendants by their attorneys, and move the court for an order requiring the plaintiff to submit to a medical examination.”

The defendants thereafter requested that the examination be by Dr. Nusbaum. Plaintiff objected to Dr. Nusbaum, stating that he would be willing to submit himself for a physical examination before any other doctor in the state of Ohio.

Following hearing as set…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. TresterOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. McCloud v. SeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API