Adkins v. Eitel
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this case we have a bill of exceptions which has been certified as being a true and complete transcription of the testimony and proceedings held on a hearing of the following motion of the defendants:
“Now come the defendants by their attorneys, and move the court for an order requiring the plaintiff to submit to a medical examination.”
The defendants thereafter requested that the examination be by Dr. Nusbaum. Plaintiff objected to Dr. Nusbaum, stating that he would be willing to submit himself for a physical examination before any other doctor in the state of Ohio.
Following hearing as set…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. TresterOhio Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
- State Ex Rel. McCloud v. SeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.