Legal Opinion

Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 4, 1995No. Civ. No. 3-94-CV-0981-DPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to the District Court’s Order of Reference filed June 28, 1995, came on to be heard July 27, 1995, Defendant’s Motion to Compel Mental Examination of Plaintiff (“Motion to Compel”), filed June 27, 1995. The issue presented by the defendant’s motion to compel is whether the plaintiff in this case, Marilyn K. Lahr, should be ordered to submit to a mental examination pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 35(a), and if so, whether defendant’s chosen expert may conduct the examination. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned finds…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tidelands Automobile Club v. Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
  3. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  3. Greenhorn v. Marriott Intern., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Abdulwali v. Washington Metro Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Bethel v. Dixie Homecrafters, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API