Legal Opinion

Holland v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1998No. 4:97-2141-23PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER SEYMOUR, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a medical malpractice action wherein Plaintiff Jerry L. Holland contends he received negligent treatment from a physician employed by Defendant United States. Mr. Holland asserts that he is disfigured and totally disabled as a consequence.

This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Rule 35 Physical Examination. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. In addition, Plaintiffs contend that, in the event the motion is granted, the court should appoint an independent medical examiner and allow audio and video recording of the examination.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  3. Ragge v. MCA/Universal StudiosDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  5. Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  2. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Newman v. San Joaquin Delta Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Calderon v. Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GmbH & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API