Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Bates

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 2001No. 2001-CA-000081-OAPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBER, Judge.

Petitioner, Richard S. Sexton (Sexton) has filed a petition for writ of prohibition. The real party in interest, Gary W. Skinner (Skinner) has filed a motion for additional time in which to respond to the petition. It is ORDERED that the motion be GRANTED. The tendered response is ORDERED Filed. The petition is hereby GRANTED.

Sexton asks this Court to prohibit the respondent trial court from requiring him to use a physician of the court’s choosing to perform an independent medical examination (IME) of Skinner pursuant to Kentucky Rule Of Civil Procedure (CR)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Perry v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. KessingerKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Southeastern United Medigroup, Inc. v. HughesKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Primm v. IsaacKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Combs v. StortzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  4. Manus, Inc. v. Terry Maxedon Hauling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  5. Blue Movies, Inc. v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API